In the context of EPSO’s selection procedures (competitions) a marker is someone whose job is to assess the quality of the candidates’ performance as regards free-text selection tests (e.g. case study, translation and linguistic revision tests, essay), by attributing a corresponding mark (value). Another word for marker could be assessor or evaluator.

Markers are officials from the EU institutions and bodies served by EPSO. Officials become markers on a voluntary basis, following a dedicated call for interest. They are nominated formally by their organisation of origin and must have a relevant profile in terms of knowledge or expertise in order to mark EPSO selection tests. They must have no conflict of interest as regards their competition in order to be confirmed as markers.

EPSO’s assessment process always involves at least one selection test requiring two markers, with a view to improving the objectivity and fairness of the process. Marking is a double-blind process, i.e. markers are not informed about the identity of the author of the scripts, and do not know the mark provided by the other marker. Every marking exercise is analysed by EPSO’s team of psychologists in order to detect any possible bias or inequality of treatment. In case of significant discrepancies between the two markers, a third marker is called in by EPSO to assess the tests in question and to provide a definitive mark.

Nominated markers are trained by EPSO on assessment methodologies before they take up their duties and continue to receive specific support from EPSO throughout their assignment.