Skip to main content
European Commission logo

Types of complaint

Technical complaint

  • What can be contested: A technical error during the tests or an organisational problem
  • Procedure: 
    Submit a complaint via: 
    1) Single candidate portal (for the competitions managed by the SCP)
    2) EPSO website contact form for all other selection procedures.
  • Actors involved: EPSO.
  • Who decides: EPSO.
  • Outcome: EPSO informs the Selection Board abut the decision (i.e. repetition of tests, etc.).

Question(s) containing error(s) (Neutralisation)

  • What can be contested: Content of the Computer-based multiple-choice test(s).
  • Procedure: 
     Submit a complaint within 3 calendar days of the date of the computer-based tests via: 
    1) Single candidate portal (for the competitions managed by the SCP)
    2) EPSO website contact form for all other selection procedures.
  • Actors involved: Selection Board.
  • Who decides: Selection Board.
  • Outcome: In case of neutralisation of a question, the points will be redistributed among the remaining questions.

Request for review

  • What can be contested: The decision of your disqualification from the competition and/or your test results.
  • Procedure: 
    Submit a complaint within 5 calendar days from the date of the decision via: 
    1) Single candidate portal (for the competitions managed by the SCP)
    2) EPSO website contact form for all other selection procedures.
  • Actors involved: Selection Board.
  • Who decides: Selection Board.
  • Outcome: In cases of readmission, candidates are reintegrated at the step of the competition where they were excluded.

Administrative complaint (ARTICLE 90)

  • What can be contested: Any decision negatively affecting your legal status as a candidate.
  • Procedure: Submit a complaint within three months from the notification of the decision via: 
    1) Single candidate portal (for the competitions managed by the SCP)
    2) EPSO website contact form for all other selection procedures.  
  • Actors involved: EPSO Legal Sector and the Selection Board.
  • Who decides: Selection Board or Appointing Authority (i.e. Director of EPSO).
  • Outcome: The Director may refer the case back to the Selection Board for re-assessment in case of error.

Complaint to the European Ombudsman

  • What can be contested: Suspected maladministration.
  • Procedure: Submit a complaint to the European Ombudsman within two years of becoming aware of the facts.
  • Actors involved: EPSO's legal sector in collaboration with the European Ombudsman.
  • Who decides: European Ombudsman.
  • Outcome: The Ombudsman issues recommendations to resolve maladministration.

Judicial Appeal

  • What can be contested: Any decision negatively affecting your legal status as a candidate.
  • Procedure: Submit an appeal to the European Union General Court within three months and ten days of notification of the decision.
  • Actors involved: EPSO's legal sector and the Commission's legal service.
  • Who decides: General Court of the European Union.
  • Outcome: The Court can annul but not amend a decision.